top of page

Alankit Assignments Limited Fake Review

Commenced in 1995, Alankit Assignments Limited has become synonymous with big brands providing similar services. While the company has managed to stay focused on its goal of being one of the biggest financial services providers, unwarranted criticisms and negative Alankit reviews have only resolved its focus to stay ahead in the race.

Not many companies receive the much deserved appreciation for their business outlook. Competitors unable to emulate their strategies or implement their own methods to achieve quantifiable results look upon the former either with awe or with the deepest abomination. The internet is home to all tools and techniques that business houses use either to promulgate their own line of business or dissipate the impact of another. Publishing fake reviews criticising assignments worked upon by a company are common. With no clear plan of action towards a profitable goal, malevolent competitors resort to submitting fake reviews on popular websites encouraging people to post salary information, company reviews and interview questions anonymously. One can see reputed conglomerates like Alankit Assignments Limited at the receiving end of harsh reprovals published under the guise of Alankit reviews across various websites dedicated to feedbacks concerning various companies.

A close look at the Alankit Assignments Limited review reveals incompatibility between the testimonials published by the company’s satisfied customers and the anonymous reviews published as employee feedback. The company’ competitors looking to prey upon its prospective customers’ credulity and lack of experience have time and again attempted to mar its reputation by publishing fake reviews in a synchronised fashion.

Alankit Assignments Limited is not the first company that has suffered owing to lack of proper policing and disciplinary regulations on the internet. This coupled with anomalous behaviour of employees who resort to severe criticism as opposed to resolving matters with the management or describing the office environment as akin to that of a government office owing to lax rules raises important questions about the credibility of such unwarranted reviews. With the company growing each year in leaps and bounds, it is impossible to believe that its employees would be unhappy working with them or face impediments in their professional growth. The incongruity of reviews published only raises suspicion regarding their truthfulness.

bottom of page